Saturday, May 30, 2015

Magnitude 4.8 Earthquake of Tanggulashan, China 2015-05-30

2015-05-30 00:04:45 (UTC) : West-NorthWest of Tanggulashan, China

earthquake monitor, China earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 4.8

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-30 00:04:45 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

34.606°N 90.998°E

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

10.0 km

Region : Tanggulashan, China
Magnitude 4.8 Earthquake of Tanggulashan, China 2015-05-30

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 137km (85mi) WNW of Tanggulashan, China

b) 356km (221mi) NNW of Nagqu, China

c) 406km (252mi) WSW of Golmud He, China

d) 515km (320mi) N of Deqen, China

e) 802km (498mi) N of Thimphu, Bhutan

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
4.8 mb
± 0.0
Location
34.606°N 90.998°E
± 9.1 km
Depth
10.0 km
± 1.9
Number of Phase Applied1
103

Minimum Distance2
1006.21 km (9.04°)

Travel Time Residual3
0.66 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
77°

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Magnitude 3.4 Earthquakeof Fairfield, Illinois 2015-05-30

2015-05-30 00:41:14 (UTC) : North of Fairfield, Illinois

earthquake monitor, Illinois earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 3.4

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-30 00:41:14 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

38.458°N 88.355°W

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

17.7 km

Region : Fairfield, Illinois
Magnitude 3.4 Earthquakeof Fairfield, Illinois 2015-05-30

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 8km (5mi) N of Fairfield, Illinois

b) 50km (31mi) ENE of Mount Vernon, Illinois

c) 68km (42mi) E of Centralia, Illinois

d) 75km (47mi) SSE of Effingham, Illinois

e) 186km (116mi) SE of Springfield, Illinois

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
3.4 mlg
--
Location
38.458°N 88.355°W
± 0.6 km
Depth
17.7 km
± 0.9
Number of Phase Applied1
27

Minimum Distance2
9.08 km (0.08°)

Travel Time Residual3
0.4 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
52°

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Magnitude 4.7 Earthquake of Itoman, Japan 2015-05-30

2015-05-30 02:37:33 (UTC) : South-East of Itoman, Japan

earthquake monitor, Japan earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 4.7

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-30 02:37:33 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

25.279°N 128.639°E

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

10.0 km

Region : Itoman, Japan
Magnitude 4.7 Earthquake of Itoman, Japan 2015-05-30

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 135km (84mi) SE of Itoman, Japan

b) 139km (86mi) SE of Tomigusuku, Japan

c) 140km (87mi) SE of Ginowan, Japan

d) 140km (87mi) SSE of Haebaru, Japan

e) 1371km (852mi) S of Seoul, South Korea

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
4.7 mb
± 0.1
Location
25.279°N 128.639°E
± 10.9 km
Depth
10.0 km
± 1.9
Number of Phase Applied1
53

Minimum Distance2
176.33 km (1.58°)

Travel Time Residual3
1.11 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
126°

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Friday, May 29, 2015

Magnitude 4.6 Earthquake of San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina 2015-05-29

2015-05-29 02:52:53 (UTC) : West of San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina

earthquake monitor, Argentina earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 4.6

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-29 02:52:53 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

24.201°S 67.029°W

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

165.3 km

Region : San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina
Magnitude 4.6 Earthquake of San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina 2015-05-29

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 72km (45mi) W of San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina

b) 176km (109mi) WNW of Salta, Argentina

c) 176km (109mi) W of San Salvador de Jujuy, Argentina

d) 184km (114mi) W of Palpala, Argentina

e) 860km (534mi) S of La Paz, Bolivia

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
4.6 mb
± 0.0
Location
24.201°S 67.029°W
± 7.8 km
Depth
165.3 km
± 7.0
Number of Phase Applied1
74

Minimum Distance2
260.71 km (2.34°)

Travel Time Residual3
1.33 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
55°

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Magnitude 6.7 Earthquake of Chirikof Island, Alaska 2015-05-29

2015-05-29 07:00:09 (UTC) : North-NorthWest of Chirikof Island, Alaska

earthquake monitor, Alaska earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 6.7

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-29 07:00:09 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

56.589°N 156.435°W

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

55.6 km

Region : Chirikof Island, Alaska
Magnitude 6.7 Earthquake of Chirikof Island, Alaska 2015-05-29

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 98km (61mi) NNW of Chirikof Island, Alaska

b) 637km (396mi) SW of Anchorage, Alaska

c) 673km (418mi) SW of Knik-Fairview, Alaska

d) 1032km (641mi) SSW of Fairbanks, Alaska

e) 1316km (818mi) W of Whitehorse, Canada

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
6.7 mb
--
Location
56.589°N 156.435°W
± 0.5 km
Depth
55.6 km
± 1.1
Number of Phase Applied1
67

Minimum Distance2
--

Travel Time Residual3
0.71 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
--

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Magnitude 4.8 Earthquake of Bharatpur, Nepal 2015-05-29

2015-05-29 09:59:59 (UTC) : North-East of Bharatpur, Nepal

earthquake monitor, Nepal earthquake, earthquake realtime

Magnitude : 4.8

Event Time: Time and Date Starting of Earthquake Rupture 
  • 2015-05-29 09:59:59 (UTC)
Earthquake data:

Location : Position of Epicenter 

27.959°N 84.760°E

Depth : Depth of starting Rupture 

10.0 km

Region : Bharatpur, Nepal
Magnitude 4.8 Earthquake of Bharatpur, Nepal 2015-05-29

Directions and Distances :Directions and Distances from Geographical Reference in Close Proximity Which can be effected by Location Uncertainty

a) 44km (27mi) NE of Bharatpur, Nepal

b) 59km (37mi) WNW of Kirtipur, Nepal

c) 62km (39mi) WNW of Kathmandu, Nepal

d) 62km (39mi) WNW of Patan, Nepal

e) 64km (40mi) NNW of Hitura, Nepal

Location Uncertainty: 
Parameter
Value
Uncertainty
Magnitude
4.8 mb
± 0.1
Location
27.959°N 84.760°E
± 9.3 km
Depth
10.0 km
± 1.9
Number of Phase Applied1
77

Minimum Distance2
61.11 km (0.55°)

Travel Time Residual3
1.06 sec

Azimuthal Gap4
42°

1Number of phase Applied: 
In determining location of hypocenter, applied number of observations on P waves and S waves. The greater the more accurate prediction of EQ.

2Minimum Distance:
 Horizontal distance of nearest Station measured in Km from epicenter. The smaller the more accuracy in prediction of depth of EQ.

3Travel Time Residual:
 A way of measurement of fit of arrival time observed to arrival time predicted for particular location. The smaller the better fit of data.

4Azimuthal Gap: 
Expressed in degree; the smaller the smaller the error in horizontal positioning of EQ. Large uncertainty is considered when exceeds 180° (both depth and location)

Sample Text